Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Na-Ri Kim vs Zhenghua Xiao Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kim vs Xiao analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Na-Ri Kim vs Zhenghua Xiao Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kim 1 - 0 Xiao
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim has won 41.76% of points on their second serve, while Xiao has won 43.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim, in recent form, has won 60% of their opponent's second serve points, while Xiao has won 55.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 48.15% and 33.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kim has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Xiao has saved 52.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kim has won 78.95% of matches played (W/L 15/ 4), with Xiao winning 47.22% (W/L 17/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kim has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 5/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3). Xiao has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Kim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 82.35% of matches (W/L 14/ 3), where as Xiao has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 12/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kim winning 1 times and Xiao being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kim winning 2 and Xiao winning 0. The last match between Kim and Xiao was at the W15 Tianjin, 24-06-2024, Q3, Hard with Na-Ri Kim getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kim and Xiao have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kim winning 0 times and Xiao 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kim winning 0, and Xiao 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of 36.63 while Xiao has played against players with an average rank of 100.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Xiao has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim has converted 53.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Xiao has converted 39.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
865
Rank
285
High
34
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
805
Rank
805
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
68% (213-101)
Career Total W/L
48% (39-42)
75% (6-2)
YTD W/L
52% (15-14)
$1,020
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Na-Ri Kim vs Zhenghua Xiao For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kim VS Xiao
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Na-Ri Kim | Zhenghua Xiao |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:0 | 1:6:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (33/52) | 62% (34/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (23/33) | 50% (17/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (9/19) | 29% (6/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 100% (3/3) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (32/55) | 38% (20/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Na-Ri Kim
Player
Zhenghua Xiao
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Na-Ri Kim | Zhenghua Xiao |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (6/2) | 52% (15/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 51% (32/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 60% (94/62) | 52% (290/267) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 52% (15/14) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 87 | 69.79 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (214/305) | 58% (560/961) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (132/214) | 60% (335/560) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (38/91) | 44% (176/401) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (24/45) | 39% (42/107) |
| Return Pts W% | 52% (154/294) | 42% (446/1055) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 83% (5/1) | 50% (12/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (6/8) | 52% (15/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 13% (15/2) |
Na-Ri Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yujin Ahn
Player
Na-Ri Kim
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
75%
(
68 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
37 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na-Ri Kim
Player
Zhuoma Ni Ma
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Na-Ri Kim
Player
Shuoran Wang
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Na-Ri Kim
Player
Zhenghua Xiao
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Cherry Kim
Player
Na-Ri Kim
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
52%
(
12 of
23)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
47%
(
15 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
40
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Na-Ri Kim
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve %
93%
(
13 of
14)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
50%
(
7 of
14)
1st Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
12 of
14)
21
Total Points Won
11
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na-Ri Kim
Player
Boyoung Jeong
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Zhenghua Xiao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | bye | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Na-Ri Kim
Player
Zhenghua Xiao
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zixuan Zeng
Player
Zhenghua Xiao
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Zhenghua Xiao
Player
Yanan Hou
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhenghua Xiao
Player
Yuping Wang
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Zhenghua Xiao
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhenghua Xiao
Player
Yanni Liu
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Zhenghua Xiao
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kudashova
Player
Zhenghua Xiao
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kim Vs Xiao Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kim are available here and Xiao photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
